Utah firing squad executes convicted killer

I always find it amusing how members of the American Civil Liberties Union cry foul when a person is executed, claiming it is barbaric and inhumane; religious individuals make similar statements. I wonder what their position would be should one of their loved-ones be needlessly murdered, shattering the lives of family and friends? They can now say it wouldn’t change a thing, that they would still oppose the death penalty, but until faced with that situation they really wouldn’t know what their true feelings would be. TGO

Refer to story below. Source: Associated Press

By JENNIFER DOBNER, Associated Press Writer Jennifer Dobner, Associated Press Writer

DRAPER, Utah – A death row inmate who had used a gun to fatally shoot two men suffered the same fate Friday morning as he was executed by a team of marksmen — the first time Utah used the firing squad to carry out a death sentence in 14 years.

A barrage of bullets tore into Ronnie Lee Gardner’s chest where a target was pinned over his heart. Two minutes later an ashen Gardner, blood pooling in his dark blue jumpsuit, was pronounced dead at 12:17 a.m.

He was the third man to die by firing squad since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976.

Unlike Gary Gilmore, who famously uttered the last words “Let’s do it” on Jan. 17, 1977, Gardner could muster few words before a black hood was fastened over his head. Asked if he had anything to say during the two minutes afforded him, Gardner said simply, “I do not, no.”

The five executioners, certified police officers who volunteered for the task and remain anonymous, stood about 25 feet away, behind a wall cut with a gunport, and were armed with matching .30-caliber Winchester rifles. One was loaded with a blank so no one knows who fired the fatal shot. Sandbags stacked behind Gardner’s chair kept the bullets from ricocheting around the cinderblock room.

Utah Department of Corrections Director Thomas Patterson said the countdown cadence went “5-4-3…” with the shooters starting to fire at the count of 2.

Gardner’s arm tensed and jerked back when he was hit. As the medical examiner checked for vital signs the hood was pulled back, revealing that Gardner’s head was tilted back and to the right, his mouth slightly open.

“I don’t agree with what he done or what they done but I’m relieved he’s free,” said Gardner’s brother, Randy Gardner, after the execution. “He’s had a rough life. He’s been incarcerated and in chains his whole damn life, now he’s free. I’m happy he’s free, just sad the way he went.”

The execution was witnessed by media representatives who are separated from witnesses for the victims or the condemned in rooms on opposite ends of the execution chamber behind reflective glass so they can’t be seen.

Gardner walked willingly to his execution, a stark contrast to the fatal escape attempt he undertook 25 years ago that resulted in his death sentence.

Gardner was sentenced to death after being convicted of murder in 1985 for the fatal courthouse shooting of attorney Michael Burdell during a failed escape attempt. Gardner was at the Salt Lake City court facing a murder charge in the shooting death of a bartender, Melvyn Otterstrom when he took a gun smuggled into him and he shot Burdell in the face as the attorney hid behind a door in the chaotic courthouse.

The execution process was set in motion in March when the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request from Gardner’s attorney to review the case. On April 23, state court Judge Robin Reese signed a warrant ordering the state to carry out the death sentence.

At that hearing, Gardner politely declared, “I would like the firing squad, please.”

He told his lawyer he did it because he preferred to die that way. Gardner was allowed to choose between the firing squad and lethal injection because he was sentenced to death before Utah eliminated the firing squad as an option in 2004. State officials did not like the negative publicity fire squad executions generated.

Gardner, 49, chose his manner of death and then worked furiously with his lawyers to prevent it. They filed petitions with state and federal courts, asked a Utah parole board to commute his sentence to life in prison without parole, and finally unsuccessfully appealed to Utah Gov. Gary Herbert and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Gardner’s attorneys argued the jury that sentenced him to death in 1985 heard no mitigating evidence that might have led them to instead impose a life sentence. Gardner’s life was marked by early drug addiction, physical and sexual abuse and possible brain damage, court records show.

They also argued he could not get a “fair and impartial hearing” before Utah’s Board of Pardons and Parole because lawyers that represent the board work for the Utah attorney general’s office, which sought his death warrant and argued against the board commuting Gardner’s death sentence

The firing squad has been Utah’s most-used form of capital punishment. Of the 49 executions held in the state since the 1850s, 40 were by firing squad.

John Albert Taylor, who raped and strangled an 11-year-old girl, was the last person executed by firing squad on Jan. 26, 1996.

Historians say the method stems from 19th Century doctrine of the state’s predominant religion. Early members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believed in the concept of “blood atonement” — that only through spilling one’s own blood could a condemned person adequately atone for their crimes and be redeemed in the next life. The church no longer preaches such teachings and offers no opinion on the use of the firing squad.

Gardner, who once described himself as a “nasty little bugger” with a mean streak, spent his last day sleeping, reading the novel “Divine Justice,” watching the “Lord of the Rings” film trilogy and meeting with his attorneys and a bishop with the Mormon church. A prison spokesman said officers described his mood as relaxed. He had eaten his last requested meal — steak, lobster tail, apple pie, vanilla ice cream and 7UP — two days earlier.

Members of his family gathered outside the prison, some wearing T-shirts displaying his prisoner number, 14873. None witnessed the execution, at Gardner’s request.

“He didn’t want nobody to see him get shot,” Randy Gardner said. “I would have liked to be there for him. I love him to death. He’s my little brother.”

The American Civil Liberties Union decried Gardner’s execution as an example of what it called the United States’ “barbaric, arbitrary and bankrupting practice of capital punishment.” And religious leaders called for an end to the death penalty at an interfaith vigil in Salt Lake City on Thursday evening.

“Murdering the murderer doesn’t create justice or settle any score,” said Rev. Tom Goldsmith of the First Unitarian Church.

Burdell’s family opposes the death penalty and asked for Gardner’s life to be spared.

But Otterstrom’s family lobbied the parole board against Gardner’s request for clemency and a reduced sentence.

George “Nick” Kirk, was a bailiff at the courthouse the day of Gardner’s botched escape. Shot and wounded in the lower abdomen, Kirk suffered chronic health problems the rest of his life.

Kirk’s daughter, Tami Stewart, said before the execution she believed Gardner’s death would bring her family some closure.

“I think at that moment, he will feel that fear that his victims felt,” she said.

___

Associated Press Writers Paul Foy and Rich Matthews contributed to this report.

About The Great One

Am interested in science and philosophy as well as sports; cycling and tennis. Enjoy reading, writing, playing chess, collecting Spyderco knives and fountain pens.
This entry was posted in General Discussion and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Utah firing squad executes convicted killer

  1. GhostRider says:

    First of all: GTO, there isn’t anything amusing about how members of the American Civil Liberties Union nor religious individuals, cry foul when a person is executed – actually, every human being should cry foul when another human being is executed – when in fact, what is really amusing here is how, even though the five executioners were certified police officers and volunteered for the task, one of matching .30-caliber Winchester rifles was loaded with a blank so no one knows who fired the fatal shot.

    What a “game” life has become, to us, under the ever pervasive captalistic umbrella we live in. In this ideology we have lost the sense of compassion and have been programmed that even with issues like revenge and forgiveness, we cannot move on until someome has “profitted” by getting justice.

    Pretty sick if you ask me and if you ask someone from Matobo, Africa, you’d get something closer to true compassion that is as pure as can be. Sure, everyone who loses somebody wants revenge on someone – on God if they can’t find anyone else – and in Matobo, the Ku believe that the only way to end grief is to save a life. If someone is murdered, a year of mourning ends with a ritual that they call “the drowning man trial.” There’s an all-night party beside a river. At dawn, the killer is put in a boat. He’s taken out on the water and he’s dropped. He’s bound, so that he can’t swim. The family of the dead then has to make a choice. They can let him drown or they can swim out and save him. The Ku believe that if the family lets the killer drown, they’ll have justice but spend the rest of their lives in mourning. But if they save him, if they admit that life isn’t always just, that very act can take away their sorrow. Vengeance is a lazy form of grief.

    We must truly try to get back all that we may have lost that makes us beautiful as a species.

    • TGO says:

      My use of the word amusing was not to be taken literally, although there is some level of amusement in the hypocrisy that members of the ACLU and religious institutions exhibit.

      The purpose of having one of the rifles used for the firing squad loaded with blanks has several personal, social and moral implications which are too involved to discuss here but that no doubt you clearly understand.

      Capitalism as defined by Wikipedia: “Capitalism is an economic system in which the means of production are privately owned; supply, demand, price, distribution, and investments are determined mainly by private decisions and market forces rather than through a planned economy; and profit is distributed to owners who invest in businesses. Capitalism also refers to the process of capital accumulation.”

      Capital punishment as defined by Wikipedia: “Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses. The term capital originates from Latin capitalis, literally “regarding the head” (Latin caput). Hence, a capital crime was originally one punished by the severing of the head.”

      Why you bring capitalism into this discussion is beyond me. The idea of capital punishment is not based on someone “profiting” by seeking retribution, but rather its purpose is purely based on justice. I do agree with you in that yes, life has become a “game” to many individuals. Individuals who needlessly take the life of others because of rage, jealousy, profit, religious indoctrination… The reasons are many and quite diverse. In my view, taking the life of one who has initiated the process by killing an innocent individual simply provides closure to the incident. This may sound cold and callous, but the criminal obviously didn’t value the victim/s life very much, so why should society at large value the criminal’s life? It’s ironic how in the minds of some the criminal becomes the victim.

      What is your preference? Would you prefer that taxpayers (talk about capitalism) pay to keep these criminals in prison for 30, 40 or 50 years; most murderers are relatively young, Or are you one of those optimistic-types who believe that most people who commit cold-blooded murder can become active members of society and contributors in a positive way?

      As far as I’m concerned, keeping these murdering scum-bags alive in prison with access to books, magazines, the internet, television, etc. while parents stare at an empty room where their now murdered child slept the previous day; or saying good-bye to your spouse in the morning never again to hear their voice; this is what’s sad. In my opinion, murderers who are given the death sentence get off easy; they get to say good-bye to family and friends and have a final meal of their choosing. Victims never receive this sort of treatment from their killer.

      As far as the people from Matobo are concerned, if this is what the Ku believe in and it works for them then I suppose they should continue the practice, although I wonder how they deal with repeat offenders. Me personally, I want the killer dead. I’ll just learn to live with whatever sorrow, if any, I’m left with.

      Unfortunately, not all humans are “beautiful.” One quick glance at the daily news will reveal that the human species is anything but “beautiful.” As Mark Twain wrote: “I have no color prejudices nor caste prejudices nor creed prejudices. All I care to know is that a man is a human being, and that is enough for me; he can’t be any worse.”

  2. michellefrommadison says:

    I would guess that those that are against it are so because of all the countless errors by the courts in the past and the current day, and not their dislike of fair justice.

Let me know your thoughts...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.