Lose Yourself: Eminem only wins 2 of 10 Grammys

This label of ‘genius’ is so over-used… There have been very few true geniuses in the history of mankind. Real geniuses such as Leonardo da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein and the like don’t come along very often. Neither do such men as Mozart, Beethoven or Chopin. To say that a rapper such as Eminem, who cannot even play a musical instrument, is “one of music’s geniuses” is idiotic to say the least. It just goes to show how low the standards of our society have fallen. TGO

Refer to story below. Source: Associated Press

Photography: Reuters

By MESFIN FEKADU, Associated Press Mesfin Fekadu, Associated Press

LOS ANGELES – The Grammys love Eminem. Over his decade plus career, they’ve showered him with 13 Grammy Awards — and gave him two during this year’s ceremonies.

But their love for Eminem seems to only extend to the rap categories. Despite being regarded as one of music’s geniuses, he has never won a Grammy outside of the genre — a streak that continued on Sunday.

Eminem, who went into the Grammys as the leading nominee with 10 nominations, including in the prestigious album, record and song of the year categories, walked away with just two: best solo rap performance and best rap album for “Recovery,” which was last year’s best-selling album and marked a triumphant comeback for an iconic figure who stumbled in recent years due to a former drug addiction.

He lost album of the year to Arcade Fire’s “The Suburbs,” and his Rihanna-assisted “Love The Way You Lie” lost to Lady Antebellum in the record and song of the year categories.

It marked the third loss in his career for Eminem in the album of the year category, as well as his Eminem’s third loss in the record of the year and second with song of the year.

While the night was a disappointing one for Eminem, it was a dream come true for the night’s top winner, Lady Antebellum. The country trio was the night’s top winner, earning the song and record of the year trophies for “Need You Now.” They won five of their six nominations.

It was their night on top in the pop world after a year of coming in second place. Their crossover hit, “Need You Now,” peaked at No. 2 on the pop charts, and their album of the same name was 2010’s second best-selling album, behind Eminem’s “Recovery.”

But on Sunday night, they were No. 1.

“That is the most humbling feeling in the entire world. It’s going to make us work even harder to make a better record,” said Hillary Scott, as bandmates Dave Haywood and Charles Kelley stood by her backstage.

It was the second year in a row that a country act with multiplatinum crossover appeal won big at the Grammys: Last year, it was Taylor Swift, who got four awards and won album of the year for “Fearless.”

This year, that award went to “The Suburbs,” which marked Arcade Fire’s only Grammy win that evening, and in 10-year career in which they have been consistent critic’s darlings. Though the album was considered to be among the year’s best, Eminem was still the favorite — so much so that Arcade Fire’s Win Butler uttered “What the hell?” when they went onstage to accept their award.

Immediately following the win, the group — who had just performed — headed to the stage in an apparently spontaneous move and played their song “Ready to Start,” where band member Win Butler advised: “Everyone leave to this song.”

The night’s biggest upset came in the best new artist category, as jazz singer Esperanza Spalding picked up the coveted best new artist Grammy.

Spalding, 26, was the first jazz artist to win the award, and beat out 16-year-old pop phenom Justin Bieber, along with Drake, Florence and the Machine and Mumford and Sons.

“I feel really lucky today,” she said backstage. “From the world that I come from this is the beginning of the beginning for me.”

Other key winners on the night included Lady Gaga, Jay-Z and John Legend, who all won three awards each, tying them for most wins following Lady A. Usher, Herbie Hancock, Jeff Beck and the Black Keys joined Eminem with two wins each.

Gaga performed her new single “Born this Way” and entered the stage in dramatic fashion — as usual. She was encased in an egg, then “hatched” onstage to perform the dance tune.

Her hit song “Bad Romance” won best female pop vocal performance and best short form music video. When she won best pop vocal album for “The Fame Monster,” she said Whitney Houston played in a role in the making of her new song.

“I wanted to thank Whitney because when I wrote ‘Born This Way,’ I imagined she was singing it because I wasn’t secure enough in myself to imagine I was a superstar,” she said.

Eminem wasn’t the only hip-hop star to lose in the night’s top honors: Newcomer B.o.B, who had 5 nods, went home empty handed, while Cee Lo Green’s expletive-laden smash, “(Expletive) You,” also known as the edited “Forget You,” only won best urban/alternative performance.

But Cee Lo had one of the night’s best performances: Dressed in a colorful feather getup that looked made him look like a gigantic colorful bird, he was joined onstage by Gwyneth Paltrow and Jim Henson Co.’s puppets, giving a funny and unforgettable performance of “Forget You.”

___

http://www.grammys.com

About The Great One

Am interested in science and philosophy as well as sports; cycling and tennis. Enjoy reading, writing, playing chess, collecting Spyderco knives and fountain pens.
This entry was posted in General Discussion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Lose Yourself: Eminem only wins 2 of 10 Grammys

  1. GhostRider says:

    My Friend… There is no scientifically precise definition of genius, and indeed the question of whether the notion itself has any real meaning could be subject of current debate. The term is used in various ways to refer to a particular aspect of an individual, or the individual in their entirety. The standards of our society have never really fallen as it takes the same amount of intelligence to get to Mensa, which by the way, accepts persons who have attained a score within the upper two percent of the general population as it always have. According to Mensa their members are geniuses, so that means, by their definition, a genius is someone who is more intelligent than 98%.

    Possibly it is that we may have over-used the label of ‘genius’ with those that came a hundred years ago. It would be difficult to argue against Albert Einstein’s genius as he fits a common definition: a person endowed with transcendent mental superiority specifically a person with a very high IQ although, Einstein never took an IQ test (they are a fairly recent development) so no one knows what his IQ is. But the fact that he was brilliant in some fields doesn’t mean he would have had a high IQ. There are people, called ‘idiot savants’ who are incredibly brilliant in one field, but hopeless at other things. Mathematics specifically, is often a field of special intensity – they can calculate numbers in their heads that you or I would have trouble entering into a computer, and then solve them faster than the computer. Was he a genius? Well, if someone, someday, comes up with the answer to a “Unified Theory” and finally discovers all the answers that Einstein was looking for but did not have the mental capability to do so, one would certainly say that this person was a genius and by comparison, Einstein was not.

    The other men you mention: Mozart, Beethoven or Chopin were in a different field so if the word “genius” applied to them, it would do so under a different definition: A genius in something or someone embodying exceptional ability, creativity, or originality, typically to a degree that is associated with the achievement of unprecedented insight. Mozart wanted to party, drink, do snuff all the time thereby squandering his talent. BTW, don’t let literature fool you, snuff was cocaine. I guy like that might be called a “dumb fuck” by many. Many a genius label comes post mortem. Indeed, in the period immediately after his death, Mozart’s reputation rose substantially: Literature described an “unprecedented wave of enthusiasm” for his work, afterwards. The church did act as a censor in those days and may have “canonized” many and create us revering them for generations.

    Actually I realise now that my rant is way too long for this venue so tomorrow, as a treat to those who can “feel” Eminem’s genius, I will post a more expanded blog with videos of the ones that got away

    • TGO says:

      I realize that the word ‘genius’ carries with it no special (designated) definition. Mensa as a parameter of intelligence is definitely meaningless, as there are countless numbers of individuals worldwide who are brilliant and would easily be eligible for membership in Mensa (hello!) yet have not chosen to “indulge” in its membership… So what’s your point?

      Anyone who wants to put up an argument that Eminem is even remotely so much as the ‘snot’ of the other individuals I mention on my Blog post: Leonardo da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Beethoven, Mozart and Chopin is either on a heavy dose of drugs, stupidly stubborn, or just plainly an imbecile.

      So…

Let me know your thoughts...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.