Santorum Proves Unfitness for Presidency with Bible Attack

Excellent commentary! It sure is refreshing to read someone who tells it like it is. One can only hope that there are enough people in America who think as Carol Bengle Gilbert thinks. TGO

Refer to story below. Source: Yahoo

Yahoo! Contributor NetworkBy Carol Bengle Gilbert | Yahoo! Contributor Network

COMMENTARY | Republican presidential contender Rick Santorum effectively disqualified himself from the office of the presidency today. Speaking in Ohio, Santorum revealed his inability to govern a pluralistic society. The truth emerged in the context of an attack on President Barack Obama, whose agenda he claimed is “about some phony ideal. Some phony theology. Not a theology based on the Bible. A different theology,” according to the Associated Press.

For a man running for president to suggest governmental policy should be based on the Bible raises a red flag that proves his unfitness for the job. Santorum calling non-Bible-based religion phony tells voters he will only represent Christians. The U.S. is not a theologically defined society but one governed by a Constitution, whose First Amendment precludes government establishment of religion. The government cannot base public policy on the Christian Bible without running afoul of this governing principle.

While Christianity is the dominant religion practiced by Americans, according to a Pew Forum report, there is no single Bible to which even they subscribe. The 78.4 percent of Americans calling themselves Christian are comprised of evangelical Protestants, mainstream Protestants, Catholics, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses and Orthodox sect members. Other religions practiced in this diverse country include Judiasm, Buddhism, Islam and Hinduism; some citizens subscribe to New Age and Native American belief systems. A substantial minority of Americans, 16.1 percent, have no religious affiliation whatsoever.

Bible-based laws and public policy have no place in America. Wasn’t that the fear Americans addressed and resolved during the 1960 election when candidate John F. Kennedy assured voters he would not be beholden to the Pope if elected to run the country? Today, the country is even more diverse than in 1960. Except for a fringe right seeking to impose its will on everyone else, there’s no support for changing our governmental form to a theocracy.

When Santorum embarrassed himself recently — and diminished his presidential chances — by disparaging blacks, he quickly backpedaled, saying he didn’t say “blacks.” Video proof indicates otherwise. It was Santorum who chose to rail about blacks on welfare; the question he replied to involved another topic altogether, foreign influence.

Will Santorum lie tomorrow to distance himself from his disqualifying religious remarks? And if he does, is there any reason in this world why voters should listen?

About The Great One

Am interested in science and philosophy as well as sports; cycling and tennis. Enjoy reading, writing, playing chess, collecting Spyderco knives and fountain pens.
This entry was posted in Politics, Religion and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Santorum Proves Unfitness for Presidency with Bible Attack

  1. GhostRider says:

    What the United States Constitution really guarantees us, and what our Founding Fathers made crystal clear, is that all citizens shall have the right to be God-freaks, or Godless-freaks and that government, that Congress, would not impede in the people’s right to get freaky and either fashion.
    -GhostRider Wisdom…that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

  2. genomega1 says:

    He is correct, any man who attends a church for twenty years that says god damn america is not a main stream christian. This is Marxists approved theology (liberation theology) and not really bible based.

    “Hoover Institute fellow Stanley Kurtz, in a political commentary in National Review, wrote that

    Cone defines it as “complete emancipation of black people from white oppression by whatever means black people deem necessary.” For Cone, the deeply racist structure of American society leaves blacks with no alternative but radical transformation or social withdrawal. So-called Christianity, as commonly practiced in the United States, is actually the racist Antichrist. “Theologically,” Cone affirms, “Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man ‘the devil.'” The false Christianity of the white-devil oppressor must be replaced by an authentic Christianity fully identified with the poor and oppressed.”

    • TGO says:

      I’m not defending Barack Obama’s “Christianity,” I simply don’t care. I believe that religion should have NO PLACE in government. Our Founding Fathers made this crystal clear over two hundred years ago, yet these God-freaks in the Republican party continue to make religion an important issue.

Let me know your thoughts...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.